After weeks of back and forth to a product which the manufacturer claims, you can resolve lipomas, was the subject to test the product but it does not have pass during the time between 27. 01. and 9.05.11 and thus is again a hope died....
Product: Bariena Lunulina balm, Thailand
Testobject: Lipoma subcutaneous in the right upper arm and in both tighs
Type of treatment: repeated rubbing of the product into the affected area
Medical results: 3 ultrsounic testing 2010/2011
Other documents used: daily records and details from the manufacturer
Side effects: Yes, initialy slight redness to the single grinding points, after longer treatment, strong redness and strong itching to the interruption of the tests.
Similar tests done before: to my knowledge No
Official registration of the product: No
According to the manufacturer, he has done so far no longer studies to sample students until few days ago he announced that on 2 days 15 minutes the balm was applied in a day. During these days there were skin problems and serve redness areas shown!
The used bottle label is in Thai language and thus hardly to understand for customers overseas about possible side effects, extras in the balm are, other than petroleum jelly, hybrid Mint, camphor, menthol and Bariena lunulina linae. In his web site, you can read that, between 2-3 weeks the lipomas should be gone.
One can summarize numerous messages from customers who have used the product as follows ......" the balm have applied several times to my "pea size" lipomas, but not as promissed, they disappeared in 2-3 weeks, but I could notice a change by "touching" and feeling" to the later perod."
Note:
All people had not before and after the time where they used the product any medical consultation and it is probably more likely from an "emotional" mind, because for a test that is not to use. Hardly a change can be seen in a "size" as such mentioned before.
In mumerous emails, the manufaturer was announced by me with conflicting information about side effects. Initially, he described this redness "positive response", later as I know him, that they have adopted a concern form with the advent of strong itching, he asked me to stop the treatment until entered a normalization for the time being. This interruption took place twice it tests, until the 9.05. due to excessive redness and itching treatment was canceled entirely, and the authorities 10 days Emu Oil were used.
To achieve clear ideas about the actual effect to get and a clear medical actionable details about this balm, several untralsound recordings were made at the beginning, during treatment and to the end of the test (23. 05) Here are the results of each test:
Test date: 23. 11. 10
-----------------------
right upper arm (1) 2.6 x 1.0 x 2.0 cm
left thigh: (1) 3.5 x 0.6 x 2.0 cm
right thigh: (1) 1.6 x 1.2 x 0.4 cm, (1) 2.6 x 0.4 x 2.1 cm
Test date: 02. 03. 11
-----------------------
right upper arm: invisiable
left thigh: (1) 3.4 x 0.6 x 2.0 cm
right thigh: (1) 1.4 x 0.5 x 2.0 cm, (1) 3.2 x 0.4 x 0.2 cm
Test date: 23. 05. 11
-----------------------
right upper arm: (1) 2.7 x 0.7 x 4.5 cm, (1) 4.0 x 1.5 x 5.1 cm
left thigh: (1) 3.8 x 0.5 x 2.0 cm
right thigh: (1) 3.6 x 0.5 x 3.7 cm, (1) 3.5 x 1.0 x 3.4 cm
A copy of the second test result was sent confidential to the manufacturer, with the reference to copyright and the ban on commercial to market these data without my consent. A ew days later I discovered by chance in a forum, that the manufacturer has changed the copies and it ereated a new report, because it was very neccessary to him to be able to present an official opinion at last. Criminal complaint is now running against him!
Conclusion:
The product has provided not the expectations of the passage ot time, nor of the fact that with this balm lipomas to "resolve" can be. Rather, it is the fact that during the test they getting more and bigger!
The objection, it would be "deep and flat sitting" lipomas is nonsense! Among other lipomas, it is the most widespread species of which we are talking about:Fibro- and Angiolipomas which differ only by the inner substance.
Another explanation o the manufacturer is that this balm penetrates only to a "certain depth" than the question is: How deep the balm can penetrate ? because the manufacturer doesn't know the answer himself an so who can give tha the answer? The only way to find out, is to do an ultrasounic test!!
The product thus has not fulfilled his task and can check off as many other products. It is not the first time that I do such tests, because the German customs seems, as reported to me is to have, because validation is not possible with stickers, which kept and thus only in Thai language, nor has a licence needed for medical and all alternative medicines or medical products.
More information on Lipoma: www.lipoma.forumieren.net
AntwortenLöschenI wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it Smile I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.
Pellet training for physicians